Is evangelism something you should ‘do’? Is this how we should think?
- I am a Christian
- The world needs to know the gospel
- Led by God, I must go and tell it/them.
I’ve believed this is the right thing to do for decades but never much liked the idea, and not been too good at it either.
There’s an alternative:
- The Kingdom is coming
- Turn to the King and follow him
I like this much better. Why are these two ideas different?
The first seems to be fatally flawed in that it casts me as the good guy and the expert and the world as the needy thing to which I am sent like a spiritual paramedic. I am broken, as truly broken as the world is, we all know this, I want to communicate this. We evangelicals like to talk about ‘one beggar telling another beggar where to find bread’: good so far. But having the wrong starting point really doesn’t help this communication effort. When I climb into the spiritual ambulance, put the blue lights on, and race helpfully towards you I am obscuring the message of our mutual need.
The second approach starts with broken me and sets as my duty ‘following Jesus’ rather than ‘evangelizing’. Go where he leads; do what he wants me to do; become what he wants me to become; and strive to form disciples en route.
The first feels like a marketing campaign, the second feels more like a pilgrimage – and also more natural, normal and slow.
There’s some Biblical heft behind the second idea (as well as personal preference). It’s what Jesus himself said and did, right from the start on the Galilee lakeside: the Kingdom is coming: embrace it.
It’s what he sent out his apostles to preach and demonstrate.
Even the Great Commission in Matthew, the final peak of Christ’s teaching, is not (as is often taught and I myself have taught) ‘go and make disciples’. It is best translated, ‘in your going’; ‘as you go’; or (I paraphrase) ‘on your way through life’, ‘make disciples of all the nations.’
I don’t think all the evidence is in my favour and I am deliberately overstating things. Just a few days ago I heard of more than 50 students making a profession of faith after what looked a lot like an evangelistic campaign in their university. Paul and other apostles clearly strategized, preached, believed they had the answers and set out to teach the world. They behaved like good evangelicals. But they were gifted evangelists. And they were only a part of the Church’s response to Christ; they had their limitations too. And perhaps campus evangelistic missions are more like the exception in church growth, not the rule.
We are not all evangelists. Teaching us all to behave like evangelists is an evangelical weakness, a weakness that’s obvious to everyone (except ourselves). We thereby seem to love to instruct people in the right way to live–not an attractive quality–rather than admitting the truth, which is that we are all hippos together in the glorious mud–but Christ has come among us.
2 thoughts on “Is evangelism biblical?”
It’s taken me many years to come to similar conclusions, Glenn, with a few insights along the way. In my limited experience, people only really listen to the Gospel when they’ve been ‘softened up’ by the Holy Spirit – I can think of 2 people who have ever ASKED me to explain the good news to them, and then it did have an effect. I’m now trying to pray by name more consistently for those I care for who don’t know the Lord; wasn’t it George Muller who prayed for 100 friends/acquaintances, and saw all except the last 4 converted – and they were too, after his death? The fact that George Muller’s life was exemplary is no coincidence either…
I think that’s really helpful. Thanks!